Score
60. Is there a Resource intensity management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
61. Is Resource intensity linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
62. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
63. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
64. What is the context?
<--- Score
65. How would you define Resource intensity leadership?
<--- Score
66. Will team members perform Resource intensity work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
67. Is there any additional Resource intensity definition of success?
<--- Score
68. Do you all define Resource intensity in the same way?
<--- Score
69. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
70. Is there a clear Resource intensity case definition?
<--- Score
71. What Resource intensity services do you require?
<--- Score
72. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
73. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
74. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
75. Who are the Resource intensity improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
76. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
77. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
78. Are the Resource intensity requirements complete?
<--- Score
79. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
80. Is Resource intensity required?
<--- Score
81. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
82. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
83. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
84. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
85. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
86. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
87. Are improvement team members fully trained on Resource intensity?
<--- Score
88. When is/was the Resource intensity start date?
<--- Score
89. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
90. How will the Resource intensity team and the group measure complete success of Resource intensity?
<--- Score
91. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
92. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
93. Is there a critical path to deliver Resource intensity results?
<--- Score
94. Will team members regularly document their Resource intensity work?
<--- Score
95. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
96. What is the scope of the Resource intensity effort?
<--- Score
97. How does the Resource intensity manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
98. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
99. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Resource intensity goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
100. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
101. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
102. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
103. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
104.
