Score
63. Are the ELK stack requirements complete?
<--- Score
64. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
65. What are (control) requirements for ELK stack Information?
<--- Score
66. How do you gather ELK stack requirements?
<--- Score
67. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
68. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
69. What sources do you use to gather information for a ELK stack study?
<--- Score
70. How do you catch ELK stack definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
71. What is the scope of the ELK stack work?
<--- Score
72. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
73. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
74. Are the ELK stack requirements testable?
<--- Score
75. Is the ELK stack scope manageable?
<--- Score
76. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
77. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
78. What was the context?
<--- Score
79. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the ELK stack goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
81. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope of ELK stack?
<--- Score
83. What is the scope of the ELK stack effort?
<--- Score
84. Do you all define ELK stack in the same way?
<--- Score
85. Is there a ELK stack management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
86. Is the scope of ELK stack defined?
<--- Score
87. How will the ELK stack team and the group measure complete success of ELK stack?
<--- Score
88. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
89. What is in scope?
<--- Score
90. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
91. What are the ELK stack tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
92. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
93. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
94. When is/was the ELK stack start date?
<--- Score
95. What is the context?
<--- Score
96. What ELK stack services do you require?
<--- Score
97. Has a ELK stack requirement not been met?
<--- Score
98. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
99. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
100. How are consistent ELK stack definitions important?
<--- Score
101. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
102. How do you hand over ELK stack context?
<--- Score
103. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
104. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected ELK stack results are met?
<--- Score
106. Are accountability and ownership for ELK stack clearly defined?
<--- Score
107. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
108.
