use cases?
<--- Score
17. Has a Community health requirement not been met?
<--- Score
18. What is the scope of the Community health work?
<--- Score
19. Who approved the Community health scope?
<--- Score
20. What is the scope of Community health?
<--- Score
21. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
22. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
23. How do you catch Community health definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
24. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
25. How have you defined all Community health requirements first?
<--- Score
26. How do you hand over Community health context?
<--- Score
27. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
28. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
29. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
30. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
31. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
32. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Community health leverage and how?
<--- Score
33. What are the record-keeping requirements of Community health activities?
<--- Score
34. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Community health results are met?
<--- Score
35. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
36. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
37. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
38. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
39. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
40. Have all basic functions of Community health been defined?
<--- Score
41. What are the Community health tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
42. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
43. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Community health work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
44. Who is gathering Community health information?
<--- Score
45. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
46. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
47. Are improvement team members fully trained on Community health?
<--- Score
48. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
49. What is the scope?
<--- Score
50. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
51. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
52. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
53. Is the Community health scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
54. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
55. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
56. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
57. Is Community health currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
58. Is Community health required?
<--- Score
59. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
60. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
61. How did the Community health manager receive input to the development of a Community health improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
