<--- Score
46. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
47. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
48. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
49. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
50. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Emergency communication systems work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
51. Are the Emergency communication systems requirements complete?
<--- Score
52. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
53. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
54. Has a Emergency communication systems requirement not been met?
<--- Score
55. What is in scope?
<--- Score
56. Will a Emergency communication systems production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
57. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
58. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
59. Is special Emergency communication systems user knowledge required?
<--- Score
60. How would you define Emergency communication systems leadership?
<--- Score
61. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
62. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
63. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
64. How did the Emergency communication systems manager receive input to the development of a Emergency communication systems improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
65. Do you all define Emergency communication systems in the same way?
<--- Score
66. What sources do you use to gather information for a Emergency communication systems study?
<--- Score
67. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
68. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
69. Has the Emergency communication systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
70. Are the Emergency communication systems requirements testable?
<--- Score
71. What happens if Emergency communication systems’s scope changes?
<--- Score
72. What was the context?
<--- Score
73. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
74. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
75. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
76. Is there a critical path to deliver Emergency communication systems results?
<--- Score
77. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
78. How does the Emergency communication systems manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
79. Are improvement team members fully trained on Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
80. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
81. How do you think the partners involved in Emergency communication systems would have defined success?
<--- Score
82. Will team members regularly document their Emergency communication systems work?
<--- Score
83. How do you manage changes in Emergency communication systems requirements?
<--- Score
84. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Emergency communication systems leverage and how?
<--- Score
86. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
87. Is the Emergency communication systems scope manageable?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of Emergency communication systems excellence?
<--- Score
