What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
90. Is there a Emergency communication systems management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
91. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emergency communication systems brings?
<--- Score
92. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
93. Is the scope of Emergency communication systems defined?
<--- Score
94. What are the core elements of the Emergency communication systems business case?
<--- Score
95. Is the Emergency communication systems scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
96. What Emergency communication systems requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
97. Who are the Emergency communication systems improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
98. What gets examined?
<--- Score
99. What is the context?
<--- Score
100. What is the scope of the Emergency communication systems effort?
<--- Score
101. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
102. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
103. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
104. What system do you use for gathering Emergency communication systems information?
<--- Score
105. Is Emergency communication systems required?
<--- Score
106. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
107. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
108. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
109. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
110. What is the scope?
<--- Score
111. How do you manage unclear Emergency communication systems requirements?
<--- Score
112. Have all basic functions of Emergency communication systems been defined?
<--- Score
113. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
114. How are consistent Emergency communication systems definitions important?
<--- Score
115. Will team members perform Emergency communication systems work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
116. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
117. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
118. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
119. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
120. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
121. What would be the goal or target for a Emergency communication systems’s improvement team?
<--- Score
122. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
123. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
124. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
125. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
126. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
127. Who is gathering Emergency communication systems information?
<--- Score
128. Is there any additional Emergency communication systems definition of success?
<--- Score
129. How can the value of Emergency communication systems be defined?
<--- Score
130. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
131. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
132. What are the Emergency communication systems use cases?
<---
