<--- Score
60. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
61. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Method of analysis results are met?
<--- Score
62. Is Method of analysis currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
63. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
64. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
65. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
66. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
67. What is the scope of the Method of analysis work?
<--- Score
68. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Method of analysis leverage and how?
<--- Score
69. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
70. Who are the Method of analysis improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
71. What happens if Method of analysis’s scope changes?
<--- Score
72. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
73. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
74. What are the record-keeping requirements of Method of analysis activities?
<--- Score
75. How does the Method of analysis manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
76. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
77. What Method of analysis requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
78. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
79. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
80. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
81. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
82. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
83. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
84. What gets examined?
<--- Score
85. What was the context?
<--- Score
86. What sources do you use to gather information for a Method of analysis study?
<--- Score
87. What is the context?
<--- Score
88. Will a Method of analysis production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
89. Is there any additional Method of analysis definition of success?
<--- Score
90. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
91. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
92. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
93. Has the Method of analysis work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
94. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
95. Who is gathering Method of analysis information?
<--- Score
96. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
97. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
98. Are accountability and ownership for Method of analysis clearly defined?
<--- Score
99. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
100. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
101. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
102. Is there a clear Method of analysis case definition?
<---
