Who needs what information?
<--- Score
70. Is it needed?
<--- Score
71. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
72. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
73. How do you assess your Environmental risk analysis workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
74. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
75. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
76. What information do users need?
<--- Score
77. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Environmental risk analysis? In other words, what are the risks, if Environmental risk analysis does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
78. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Environmental risk analysis?
<--- Score
79. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
80. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Environmental risk analysis team, Environmental risk analysis itself?
<--- Score
81. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
82. What Environmental risk analysis capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
83. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
84. Why the need?
<--- Score
85. What situation(s) led to this Environmental risk analysis Self Assessment?
<--- Score
86. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Environmental risk analysis as an effective investment?
<--- Score
87. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
88. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
89. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
90. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
91. What are the expected benefits of Environmental risk analysis to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
92. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
93. What is the extent or complexity of the Environmental risk analysis problem?
<--- Score
94. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Environmental risk analysis?
<--- Score
95. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Environmental risk analysis Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
2. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
3. Is Environmental risk analysis linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
4. How does the Environmental risk analysis manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
5. Has a Environmental risk analysis requirement not been met?
<--- Score
6. What system do you use for gathering Environmental risk analysis information?
<--- Score
7. Do you have a Environmental risk analysis success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
8. How do you hand over Environmental risk analysis context?
<--- Score
9. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Environmental risk analysis work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
10. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
11. Does the scope remain the same?
<---
