Score
100. What is the scope of the Environmental risk analysis work?
<--- Score
101. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
102. Has the Environmental risk analysis work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
103. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
104. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
105. Is the Environmental risk analysis scope manageable?
<--- Score
106. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
107. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Environmental risk analysis brings?
<--- Score
108. What was the context?
<--- Score
109. How are consistent Environmental risk analysis definitions important?
<--- Score
110. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
111. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
112. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
113. What are the Environmental risk analysis tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
114. What is in scope?
<--- Score
115. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
116. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
117. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
118. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
119. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
120. What are the core elements of the Environmental risk analysis business case?
<--- Score
121. How have you defined all Environmental risk analysis requirements first?
<--- Score
122. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
123. Is Environmental risk analysis currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
124. Is there a Environmental risk analysis management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
125. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
126. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
127. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
128. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
129. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
130. Who are the Environmental risk analysis improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
131. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
132. Are the Environmental risk analysis requirements complete?
<--- Score
133. Who approved the Environmental risk analysis scope?
<--- Score
134. How do you catch Environmental risk analysis definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
135. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
136. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Environmental risk analysis Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What evidence is there and what is measured?
