Score
56. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
57. What sources do you use to gather information for a Environmental risk analysis study?
<--- Score
58. How will the Environmental risk analysis team and the group measure complete success of Environmental risk analysis?
<--- Score
59. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
60. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Environmental risk analysis leverage and how?
<--- Score
61. Is special Environmental risk analysis user knowledge required?
<--- Score
62. What is the scope of the Environmental risk analysis effort?
<--- Score
63. Do you all define Environmental risk analysis in the same way?
<--- Score
64. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
65. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
66. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
67. Are accountability and ownership for Environmental risk analysis clearly defined?
<--- Score
68. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
69. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
70. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
71. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental risk analysis’s improvement team?
<--- Score
72. Is there a clear Environmental risk analysis case definition?
<--- Score
73. Is the Environmental risk analysis scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
74. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
75. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
76. Are the Environmental risk analysis requirements testable?
<--- Score
77. When is/was the Environmental risk analysis start date?
<--- Score
78. Will a Environmental risk analysis production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
79. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
80. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
81. What is the definition of Environmental risk analysis excellence?
<--- Score
82. What is the context?
<--- Score
83. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
84. How did the Environmental risk analysis manager receive input to the development of a Environmental risk analysis improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
85. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
86. What is the scope?
<--- Score
87. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
88. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
89. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
90. Is the scope of Environmental risk analysis defined?
<--- Score
91. Have all basic functions of Environmental risk analysis been defined?
<--- Score
92. Is Environmental risk analysis required?
<--- Score
93. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental risk analysis? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
94. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
95. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
96. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental risk analysis?
<--- Score
97. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
98. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
99. How often are the team meetings?
<---
