12. What are the Environmental risk analysis use cases?
<--- Score
13. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
14. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
15. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
17. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
18. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
19. How do you manage unclear Environmental risk analysis requirements?
<--- Score
20. How do you gather Environmental risk analysis requirements?
<--- Score
21. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
22. Who is gathering Environmental risk analysis information?
<--- Score
23. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
24. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
25. What gets examined?
<--- Score
26. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
27. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
28. What Environmental risk analysis services do you require?
<--- Score
29. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
30. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
31. Is there a critical path to deliver Environmental risk analysis results?
<--- Score
32. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
33. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
34. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
35. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
36. How do you think the partners involved in Environmental risk analysis would have defined success?
<--- Score
37. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Environmental risk analysis results are met?
<--- Score
38. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
39. What are the record-keeping requirements of Environmental risk analysis activities?
<--- Score
40. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
41. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
42. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
43. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
44. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
45. How would you define Environmental risk analysis leadership?
<--- Score
46. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
47. How can the value of Environmental risk analysis be defined?
<--- Score
48. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
49. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
50. What Environmental risk analysis requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
51. What are (control) requirements for Environmental risk analysis Information?
<--- Score
52. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
53. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental risk analysis goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
54. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
55. What is the scope of Environmental risk analysis?
<---
