Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
20. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
21. Is there any additional Theory of governance definition of success?
<--- Score
22. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
23. How will the Theory of governance team and the group measure complete success of Theory of governance?
<--- Score
24. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
25. What is in scope?
<--- Score
26. Are the Theory of governance requirements complete?
<--- Score
27. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
29. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Theory of governance results are met?
<--- Score
30. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
31. Is the Theory of governance scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
32. What is the scope of the Theory of governance effort?
<--- Score
33. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Theory of governance? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
34. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
35. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
36. How do you manage unclear Theory of governance requirements?
<--- Score
37. What would be the goal or target for a Theory of governance’s improvement team?
<--- Score
38. How can the value of Theory of governance be defined?
<--- Score
39. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
40. Why are you doing Theory of governance and what is the scope?
<--- Score
41. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
42. How do you gather Theory of governance requirements?
<--- Score
43. Is there a critical path to deliver Theory of governance results?
<--- Score
44. How would you define Theory of governance leadership?
<--- Score
45. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
46. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
47. Is the Theory of governance scope manageable?
<--- Score
48. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Theory of governance work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
49. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
50. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Theory of governance brings?
<--- Score
51. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
52. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
54. How do you think the partners involved in Theory of governance would have defined success?
<--- Score
55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Theory of governance?
<--- Score
56. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
57. Is Theory of governance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
58. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
59. Who approved the Theory of governance scope?
<--- Score
60. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
61. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
62. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
63. Are required
