Team Member Status Report: Concurrent System217
3.2 Change Request: Concurrent System219
3.3 Change Log: Concurrent System221
3.4 Decision Log: Concurrent System223
3.5 Quality Audit: Concurrent System225
3.6 Team Directory: Concurrent System228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Concurrent System230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Concurrent System232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Concurrent System234
3.10 Issue Log: Concurrent System236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Concurrent System237
4.1 Project Performance Report: Concurrent System239
4.2 Variance Analysis: Concurrent System241
4.3 Earned Value Status: Concurrent System243
4.4 Risk Audit: Concurrent System245
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Concurrent System247
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Concurrent System249
5.0 Closing Process Group: Concurrent System251
5.1 Procurement Audit: Concurrent System253
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Concurrent System256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Concurrent System258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Concurrent System260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
2. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
3. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
4. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
5. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Concurrent system will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
6. What Concurrent system coordination do you need?
<--- Score
7. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
8. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
9. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Concurrent system delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
10. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
11. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
12. Have you identified your Concurrent system key performance indicators?
<--- Score
13. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
14. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
15. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Concurrent system?
<--- Score
16. What Concurrent system problem should be solved?
<--- Score
17. What does Concurrent system success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
18. What is the extent or complexity of the Concurrent system problem?
<--- Score
19. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
20. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Concurrent system as an effective investment?
<--- Score
21. Do you need to avoid or amend any Concurrent system activities?
<--- Score
22. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
23. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
24. Will Concurrent system deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
25. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
26. Which information does the Concurrent system business case need to include?
<--- Score
27. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Concurrent system team, Concurrent system itself?
<--- Score
28. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
29. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
30. How do you take a forward-looking
