Score
61. Has a Concurrent system requirement not been met?
<--- Score
62. What is the context?
<--- Score
63. Is there a Concurrent system management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
64. What are (control) requirements for Concurrent system Information?
<--- Score
65. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
66. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
67. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
68. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
69. Are the Concurrent system requirements testable?
<--- Score
70. Is the Concurrent system scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
71. What is the definition of Concurrent system excellence?
<--- Score
72. What would be the goal or target for a Concurrent system’s improvement team?
<--- Score
73. How did the Concurrent system manager receive input to the development of a Concurrent system improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
74. Do you all define Concurrent system in the same way?
<--- Score
75. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
76. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
77. What is the scope?
<--- Score
78. How have you defined all Concurrent system requirements first?
<--- Score
79. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
80. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
81. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
82. How do you gather Concurrent system requirements?
<--- Score
83. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope of Concurrent system?
<--- Score
85. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
86. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
87. Are the Concurrent system requirements complete?
<--- Score
88. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
89. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
90. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
91. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
92. What is in scope?
<--- Score
93. How are consistent Concurrent system definitions important?
<--- Score
94. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
95. Are improvement team members fully trained on Concurrent system?
<--- Score
96. How do you manage unclear Concurrent system requirements?
<--- Score
97. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
98. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
99. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
100. What are the record-keeping requirements of Concurrent system activities?
<--- Score
101. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
102. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
103. What Concurrent system services do you require?
<--- Score
104. How do you catch Concurrent system definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
105. Is there any additional Concurrent system definition of success?
<--- Score
