What is the scope of the Concurrent system work?
<--- Score
18. How will the Concurrent system team and the group measure complete success of Concurrent system?
<--- Score
19. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
20. How do you manage changes in Concurrent system requirements?
<--- Score
21. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
22. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
23. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
24. Have all basic functions of Concurrent system been defined?
<--- Score
25. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
26. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
27. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
28. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
29. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
30. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
31. What are the core elements of the Concurrent system business case?
<--- Score
32. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
33. Who are the Concurrent system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
34. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
35. What are the Concurrent system use cases?
<--- Score
36. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
37. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
38. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
39. What are the Concurrent system tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
40. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
41. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
42. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Concurrent system? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
43. Is there a critical path to deliver Concurrent system results?
<--- Score
44. How does the Concurrent system manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
45. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
46. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
47. Is the Concurrent system scope manageable?
<--- Score
48. Do you have a Concurrent system success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
49. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Concurrent system results are met?
<--- Score
50. Are accountability and ownership for Concurrent system clearly defined?
<--- Score
51. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
52. Is there a clear Concurrent system case definition?
<--- Score
53. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
54. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
55. Will a Concurrent system production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
56. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
57. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
58. Has the Concurrent system work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
59. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
60. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<---
