When is/was the Concurrent system start date?
<--- Score
107. What sources do you use to gather information for a Concurrent system study?
<--- Score
108. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
109. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
110. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
111. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
112. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
113. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
114. Will team members regularly document their Concurrent system work?
<--- Score
115. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Concurrent system brings?
<--- Score
116. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Concurrent system?
<--- Score
117. How would you define Concurrent system leadership?
<--- Score
118. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
119. What happens if Concurrent system’s scope changes?
<--- Score
120. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
121. Is Concurrent system linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
122. Who is gathering Concurrent system information?
<--- Score
123. How can the value of Concurrent system be defined?
<--- Score
124. Who approved the Concurrent system scope?
<--- Score
125. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
126. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
127. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
128. How do you think the partners involved in Concurrent system would have defined success?
<--- Score
129. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
130. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
131. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
132. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
133. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
134. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
135. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
136. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Concurrent system leverage and how?
<--- Score
137. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
138. Will team members perform Concurrent system work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
139. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Concurrent system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How is the value delivered by Concurrent system being measured?
<--- Score
2. What are the current costs of the Concurrent system process?
<--- Score
3. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
4. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
5. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<---
