Score
59. What are (control) requirements for Learning society Information?
<--- Score
60. Do you have a Learning society success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
61. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
62. How do you manage changes in Learning society requirements?
<--- Score
63. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
64. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
65. How would you define Learning society leadership?
<--- Score
66. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
67. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
68. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Learning society brings?
<--- Score
69. What are the core elements of the Learning society business case?
<--- Score
70. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
71. Is the Learning society scope manageable?
<--- Score
72. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
73. What system do you use for gathering Learning society information?
<--- Score
74. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
75. Are accountability and ownership for Learning society clearly defined?
<--- Score
76. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
77. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Learning society work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
78. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
79. Are the Learning society requirements testable?
<--- Score
80. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
81. What happens if Learning society’s scope changes?
<--- Score
82. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
83. How are consistent Learning society definitions important?
<--- Score
84. How do you hand over Learning society context?
<--- Score
85. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
86. Who approved the Learning society scope?
<--- Score
87. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
88. Is there a critical path to deliver Learning society results?
<--- Score
89. Who are the Learning society improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
90. What is the context?
<--- Score
91. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
92. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
93. Is there a Learning society management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
94. What is the scope of the Learning society effort?
<--- Score
95. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
96. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
97. How do you manage unclear Learning society requirements?
<--- Score
98. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
99. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
100. How can the value of Learning society be defined?
<--- Score
101. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
102. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
