15. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
16. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
17. Will team members perform Risk based pricing work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
18. How do you hand over Risk based pricing context?
<--- Score
19. What are the Risk based pricing use cases?
<--- Score
20. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
21. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
22. What was the context?
<--- Score
23. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
24. Will team members regularly document their Risk based pricing work?
<--- Score
25. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
26. Do you all define Risk based pricing in the same way?
<--- Score
27. What is the scope of the Risk based pricing work?
<--- Score
28. How would you define Risk based pricing leadership?
<--- Score
29. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
30. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
31. What system do you use for gathering Risk based pricing information?
<--- Score
32. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
33. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
34. Is there any additional Risk based pricing definition of success?
<--- Score
35. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Risk based pricing changes?
<--- Score
36. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
37. How does the Risk based pricing manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
38. Is Risk based pricing linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
39. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
40. Has the Risk based pricing work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
41. Is there a clear Risk based pricing case definition?
<--- Score
42. What Risk based pricing requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
43. What are the core elements of the Risk based pricing business case?
<--- Score
44. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
45. Is the Risk based pricing scope manageable?
<--- Score
46. Who approved the Risk based pricing scope?
<--- Score
47. Is the Risk based pricing scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
48. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
49. How do you catch Risk based pricing definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
50. Is the scope of Risk based pricing defined?
<--- Score
51. Have all basic functions of Risk based pricing been defined?
<--- Score
52. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
53. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
54. Are the Risk based pricing requirements testable?
<--- Score
55. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
56. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
57. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
58. How have you defined all Risk based pricing requirements first?
<--- Score
59. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<---
