Score
60. Are improvement team members fully trained on DRIVE Technology?
<--- Score
61. Is special DRIVE Technology user knowledge required?
<--- Score
62. Will team members regularly document their DRIVE Technology work?
<--- Score
63. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
64. What is in scope?
<--- Score
65. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
66. Has a DRIVE Technology requirement not been met?
<--- Score
67. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
68. What are the record-keeping requirements of DRIVE Technology activities?
<--- Score
69. Who are the DRIVE Technology improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
70. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
71. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
72. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
73. Is there a critical path to deliver DRIVE Technology results?
<--- Score
74. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
75. Has the DRIVE Technology work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
76. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
77. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
78. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
79. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
80. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
81. What are the DRIVE Technology tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
82. What would be the goal or target for a DRIVE Technology’s improvement team?
<--- Score
83. How will the DRIVE Technology team and the group measure complete success of DRIVE Technology?
<--- Score
84. Is there a clear DRIVE Technology case definition?
<--- Score
85. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
86. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
87. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
88. What happens if DRIVE Technology’s scope changes?
<--- Score
89. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
90. How did the DRIVE Technology manager receive input to the development of a DRIVE Technology improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
91. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
92. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform DRIVE Technology work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
94. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
95. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
96. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
97. How do you catch DRIVE Technology definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
98. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
99. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
100. When is/was the DRIVE Technology start date?
<--- Score
101. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
102. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
103. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
