DNA- and RNA-Based Computing Systems. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу DNA- and RNA-Based Computing Systems - Группа авторов страница 26
![DNA- and RNA-Based Computing Systems - Группа авторов DNA- and RNA-Based Computing Systems - Группа авторов](/cover_pre855655.jpg)
Figure 4.1 Examples of deoxyribozyme‐based logic gates. (a) One of the first DNA logic gates: deoxyribozyme (Dz)‐based two‐input AND gate (2iAND)[14]. Input‐recognition modules are in green and blue. Upon hybridization of inputs IA and IB, the substrate‐binding arms are unblocked, which restores RCDZ activity to cleave a fluorophore‐ and quencher‐labeled reporter substrate (F sub). FAM is fluorescein; Q is a dark quencher of fluorescence. (b) Dz‐based five‐input AND gate (5iAND). Dz catalytic core regains activity only when all five oligonucleotide inputs (I1–I5) are present. I1, I2, I3, and I4 open the inactivating stems, while I5 bridges strands Dza and Dzb together to form a catalytic core [37].
Source: Based on Stojanovic et al. [14].
The RCDZ logic gates can be connected via cascades of deoxyribozyme‐catalyzed reactions. For example, Stojanovic et al. connected YES, NOT, AND, and ANDNOT logic gates to downstream YES RCDZ gate [40]. An example of 2iAND gate is shown in Figure 4.2. Deoxyribozyme ligase‐based 2iAND gate, when activated by the two DNA inputs IA and IB, can bind the two short strands OUTa and OUTb and covalently link them into a longer oligonucleotide OUT (Figure 4.2c). The latter can be recognized by a downstream RCDZ gate, as shown in Figure 4.2d. Such cascade resulted in a two‐layer logic gate integration. Incubation period for up to 60 minutes was required for this system to achieve fluorescent response above the background. The disadvantage of the system is slow release of the output oligonucleotide from the complex with the ligase gate, since the product of ligation has higher affinity to the DNA ligase than the substrates (OUTa and OUTb).
Figure 4.2 AND deoxyribozyme ligase gate connected to YES RCDZ gates. (a) DNA ligase‐based two‐input AND gate: the ligase Dz is inhibited by two stem‐loop structures. Inputs IA and IB unwind the inactivating stem‐loops and enable the DNA ligase to ligate strands OUTa and OUTb to produce the OUT strand. The OUT strand activates RCDZ for cleavage of F sub followed by fluorescence increase. (b) Beads 1 and 2 contain immobilized RCDZ constructs and their corresponding substrates. They act as YES logic gates: in the presence of the oligonucleotide inputs I1 and I2, they activate RCDZ and release OUT1 and OUT2 oligonucleotides. The released OUT1 and OUT2 can activate AND2,3 gate on the third bead, which can be monitored via fluorescence.
Yashin et al. immobilized RCDZ constructs on microsphere beads together with their substrates (Figure 4.2b) [41]. The substrates were inactivated by complementary strands, which could be removed by inputs I1 and I2, respectively (not shown in Figure 4.2b). The YES beads, activated by certain input combination, could release their oligonucleotide outputs in solution (OUT1 and OUT2), which then could be recognized by downstream logic gates (AND2,3 gate in Figure 4.2b). Three-layer integration was achieved. The advantage of the approach is in the ability to monitor the fluorescent signal from individual beads by flow cytometry. However, hybridization of the bead‐immobilized oligonucleotides might be significantly slower than that in solution [42]. Indeed, time needed to observe a strong signal on the last bead in this case was 16 hours [41].
Bone et al. used split cascades based on the most catalytically active 10–23 Dz that enable realizing inactivated RCDZ [43]. This approach can reduce the amount of input required for cascade activation from 20–1000 nM to 20–100 pM [43,37,44].
4.3 Connecting Gates Based on DNA Strand Displacement
The design of seesaw gates [53] takes advantage of DNA strand displacement, e.g. the ability of a partial DNA duplex to release one strand upon hybridization of the second strand with an interfering strand that can form more Watson–Crick base pairs than presented in the original duplex (Figure 4.3a). The phenomenon has been used as a probe for the detection of specific nucleic acids in several variations [45–52]. For example, a DNA duplex composed of a 5′‐fluorophore‐labeled and a 3′‐quencher‐labeled oligonucleotide strands can be interrogated by a complementary analyte that “pushes” the fluorophore‐containing strand in solution (Figure 4.3a), which can be reported as a fluorescent signal in a quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) format [48].
Figure 4.3 Design of strand displacement (seesaw) DNA logic gates [53]. (a) Strand displacement‐based sensor for nucleic acid detection. (b) Two‐input AND logic gate, which consist of the complex īA and īB with OUT1, releases OUT1 as an output upon binding to inputs īA and īB. Red dashed line indicates unique sequence independent on the sequence of īA and īB strands. (c) Dual‐rail logic. YES gate made with rail logic. X0 and X1 represent negative or positive input, respectively. Y0 and Y1 represent negative or positive output signal, respectively.
The advantages of this system for DNA logic gate design are the following:
1 (i) Design simplicity.
2 (ii) The double‐stranded constructs with only short single‐stranded overhangs ( toeholds) reduce the nonspecific associations between oligonucleotides, which enables usage of many different