Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis. Robert E. Blankenship

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis - Robert E. Blankenship страница 26

Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis - Robert E. Blankenship

Скачать книгу

to become more reduced. This experiment was the clearest early evidence for two photochemical systems connected in series in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms.

      Source: Duysens et al. (1961)/Springer Nature.

      Source: Hill and Bendall (1960) (p. 137)/Springer Nature.

      The slightly later publication by Duysens and coworkers provided the crucial experimental evidence for this proposal, in the form of the antagonistic effects described above. One photochemical reaction, now known as Photosystem II, oxidizes water and reduces cytochrome f, while the other, now known as Photosystem I, oxidizes cytochrome f and reduces NADP+ (Duysens et al., 1961; Duysens, 1989).

      The puzzling results of the red drop and enhancement effects are easily explained by this formulation of two photochemical reactions connected in series, if the absorption spectra of the pigments that feed energy to them are not quite the same. The shorter‐wavelength chlorophylls (and the phycobilisome antennas in those organisms that contain them) preferentially drive Photosystem II, whereas the longer‐wavelength pigments preferentially drive Photosystem I. Optimum rates of photosynthesis are observed when both short and long wavelengths are present, as found in the enhancement experiments. The light absorbed by the long‐wavelength pigments does not have enough energy to drive Photosystem II, so the entire system grinds to a halt if only far‐red light is used, thus explaining the red drop phenomenon. In retrospect, it was fortunate that the two photosystems had somewhat different wavelength optima, as the key early experiments demonstrating their existence all relied on preferential excitation of one or the other photosystem by carefully selecting the illumination regime.

      The series formulation for oxygen‐evolving photosynthesis has been tested and questioned many times since 1960 and has withstood all challenges. There is now no doubt that this basic framework for photosynthetic electron flow in oxygen‐evolving organisms is correct. As we will see in later chapters, the two photosystems have been separated, biochemically purified, and their structures determined. The proteins that make them up to have been identified, and the genes that code for them identified and sequenced. While many questions remain about how the two photosystems interact and how both energy input to them from the antennas and electron flow between them is regulated, the Z scheme is an essential feature of the modern understanding of photosynthesis.

      So far, we have focused first on the overall process of photosynthesis and then on the discoveries leading up to the discovery of the series formulation of electron transport in oxygen‐evolving photosynthetic organisms, resulting in the reduction of NADP+ to NADPH. There is another critical part to the story, however, involving the light‐dependent formation of ATP and the subsequent utilization of these two products to reduce CO2 to carbohydrates. The discoveries of these processes paralleled the discoveries of the electron transfer processes.

      The discovery that chloroplasts could make ATP in a light‐dependent manner was made in 1954, by Daniel Arnon and coworkers at the University of California, Berkeley (Arnon et al., 1954). The idea that chloroplasts could make ATP, in a process called photophosphorylation, initially met with considerable resistance, because it was well known that mitochondria produced large amounts of ATP and, since chloroplasts in many ways drive the mitochondrial reaction in the opposite direction, this initially seemed backward (Arnon, 1984). An analogous discovery of light‐driven ATP formation in non‐oxygen‐evolving purple bacteria was made by Howard Gest and Martin Kamen (1948). The chemiosmotic hypothesis, the theoretical framework for the mechanism of how photon energy is stored in ATP, was provided by the incisive analysis of Peter Mitchell in the 1960s and 1970s, for which he received the Nobel prize in 1978 (Mitchell, 1979). We will discuss the details of the ATP synthesis process in Chapter 8.

      At approximately the same time as Arnon was demonstrating photophosphorylation on one side of the Berkeley campus of the University of California, Melvin Calvin, Andrew Benson, and coworkers were working to understand the details of the carbon assimilation process itself on the other side of the campus (Calvin, 1989; Benson, 2002). They elucidated the chemical reactions that convert CO2 and assimilatory power into carbohydrates. These reactions have become known as the Calvin–Benson cycle, and Calvin was awarded the Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1961 in recognition of the brilliant elucidation of this complex set of reactions. He and his coworkers used the newly developed method of radioactive tracers, injecting algae with 14CO2 and then following the path of the radioactivity in the products (Creager, 2013). We will discuss the details of the Calvin–Benson cycle and other aspects of carbon metabolism in Chapter 9.

      1 Arnon, D. I. (1984) The discovery of photosynthetic phosphorylation. Trends in Biochemical

Скачать книгу