Autonomous Airborne Wireless Networks. Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

alt="upper P Subscript upper R Baseline equals upper P Subscript upper T Baseline upper G Subscript upper T Baseline upper G Subscript upper R Baseline left-parenthesis StartFraction lamda Subscript c Baseline Over 4 pi d EndFraction right-parenthesis squared comma"/>

where denotes the transmitted signal power, and represent the gain of the transmitter and receiver antennas, respectively, is the ground distance between the transmitter and receiver, and is the carrier wavelength. Path loss exponent is the rate of distance‐dependent power loss, where varies with environments. In Eq. (2.2), for free space propagation. Therefore, the distance‐dependent path loss expression can be generalized as

      (2.3)

Air‐to‐Ground Channel In urban environment, the AG channel may not experience complete free space propagation. In the existing literature on UAV communications, the log‐distance model is the prominently used path loss model due to its simplicity and applicability when environmental parameters are difficult to define. Therefore, path loss in dB is given by

      (2.4)

where is the path loss for the reference distance . For the same propagation distance between the ground device and the UAV, large‐scale variations are different at different locations within the same environment because the materials of obstacles vary from each other, which affects the radio signal propagation. As a result, at any distance , in Eq. (2.1) is the shadow fading measured in dB and modeled as the normal random variable with variance in dB. This model is extensively applied for modeling of the terrestrial channels. Table 2.2 lists some measurement campaigns for the estimations of path loss and large‐scale effects.

      Another popular channel model to characterize the AG propagation in UAV communications is the probabilistic path loss model in [4] and [17]. In [17], the path loss between the ground device and the UAV is dependent on the position of the UAV and the propagation environments (e.g. suburban, urban, dense‐urban, high‐rise). Consequently, during the AG radio propagation, the communication link can be either LoS or NLoS depending on the environment. Many of the existing works [18–35] on UAV communications adopted the probabilistic path loss model of [4] and [17]. In these works, the probability of occurrence of LoS and NLoS links are functions of the environmental parameters, height of the buildings, and the elevation angle between the ground device and the UAV. This model is based on environmental parameters defined in the recommendations of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). In particular, ITU‐R provides statistical parameters related to the environment that determine the height, number, and density of the buildings or obstacles. For instance, in [36], the height of the buildings can be modeled by using the Rayleigh distribution. The average path loss for the AG propagation in [17] is given as

      (2.5)

      where and are the LoS and NLoS path loss, respectively, for the free space propagation. is the LoS probability given as

(2.6)

Table 2.2 Measurement campaigns to characterize the path loss and large‐scale AG propagation fading.

References	Scenario		(dB)	(dB)
Yanmaz et al. [8]	Urban/Open field	2.2–2.6	—	—
Yanmaz et al. [9]	Open field	2.01	—	—
Ahmed et al. [10]	—	2.32	—	—
Khawaja et al. [11]	Suburban/Open field	2.54–3.037	21.9–34.9	2.79–5.3
Newhall et al. [12]	Urban/Rural	Скачать книгу В начало < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > В конец e-mail: [email protected]