<--- Score
110. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
111. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Learning Design goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
112. Will a Learning Design production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
113. Is the Learning Design scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
114. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
115. What are the Learning Design tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
116. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
117. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
118. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
119. Who approved the Learning Design scope?
<--- Score
120. What is the scope of Learning Design?
<--- Score
121. What is the context?
<--- Score
122. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
123. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
124. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
125. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
126. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Learning Design? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
127. Is there a critical path to deliver Learning Design results?
<--- Score
128. How do you manage changes in Learning Design requirements?
<--- Score
129. What is the definition of Learning Design excellence?
<--- Score
130. How do you catch Learning Design definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
131. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
132. What are the core elements of the Learning Design business case?
<--- Score
133. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
134. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
135. What was the context?
<--- Score
136. Has a Learning Design requirement not been met?
<--- Score
137. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
138. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
139. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Learning Design Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
2. How frequently do you verify your Learning Design strategy?
<--- Score
3. How sensitive must the Learning Design strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
4. Are indirect costs charged to the Learning Design program?
<--- Score
5. Are there competing Learning Design priorities?
<--- Score
6. Is a follow-up focused external Learning Design review required?
<--- Score
7. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
8. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
