Score
65. How would you define Learning Design leadership?
<--- Score
66. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
67. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
68. What would be the goal or target for a Learning Design’s improvement team?
<--- Score
69. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
70. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
71. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
72. What is in scope?
<--- Score
73. Are the Learning Design requirements complete?
<--- Score
74. Has the Learning Design work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
75. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
76. Is Learning Design currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
77. Are improvement team members fully trained on Learning Design?
<--- Score
78. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
79. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
80. What is the scope of the Learning Design effort?
<--- Score
81. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
82. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Learning Design leverage and how?
<--- Score
83. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
84. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
85. Do you all define Learning Design in the same way?
<--- Score
86. Do you have a Learning Design success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
87. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
88. How have you defined all Learning Design requirements first?
<--- Score
89. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Learning Design?
<--- Score
90. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
91. Who are the Learning Design improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
92. Have all basic functions of Learning Design been defined?
<--- Score
93. Is Learning Design required?
<--- Score
94. What Learning Design services do you require?
<--- Score
95. Will team members perform Learning Design work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
96. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
97. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
98. Is the Learning Design scope manageable?
<--- Score
99. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
100. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
101. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
102. What are the Learning Design use cases?
<--- Score
103. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
104. How do you think the partners involved in Learning Design would have defined success?
<--- Score
105. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
106. When is/was the Learning Design start date?
<--- Score
107. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
108. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
109. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
