Plan: Master Data Services211
3.0 Executing Process Group: Master Data Services213
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Master Data Services215
3.2 Change Request: Master Data Services217
3.3 Change Log: Master Data Services219
3.4 Decision Log: Master Data Services221
3.5 Quality Audit: Master Data Services223
3.6 Team Directory: Master Data Services225
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Master Data Services227
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Master Data Services229
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Master Data Services232
3.10 Issue Log: Master Data Services234
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Master Data Services236
4.1 Project Performance Report: Master Data Services238
4.2 Variance Analysis: Master Data Services240
4.3 Earned Value Status: Master Data Services242
4.4 Risk Audit: Master Data Services244
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Master Data Services246
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Master Data Services248
5.0 Closing Process Group: Master Data Services250
5.1 Procurement Audit: Master Data Services252
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Master Data Services254
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Master Data Services256
5.4 Lessons Learned: Master Data Services258
Index260
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Which deployment architecture will serve your needs within the limits of your resources?
<--- Score
2. For your Master Data Services project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
3. What Master Data Services events should you attend?
<--- Score
4. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
5. Who should resolve the Master Data Services issues?
<--- Score
6. Have you identified your Master Data Services key performance indicators?
<--- Score
7. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
8. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Master Data Services as an effective investment?
<--- Score
9. How are the Master Data Services’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
10. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
11. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
12. What information do users need?
<--- Score
13. Will Master Data Services deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
14. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Master Data Services? In other words, what are the risks, if Master Data Services does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
15. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
16. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
17. Is it needed?
<--- Score
18. How are the entities identified?
<--- Score
19. What would happen if Master Data Services weren’t done?
<--- Score
20. What Master Data Services coordination do you need?
<--- Score
21. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
22. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Master Data Services leader?
<--- Score
23. What Master Data Services problem should be solved?
<--- Score
24. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
25. Consider your own Master Data Services project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
26. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
27. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
28. How do you
