Score
68. Has the Master Data Services work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
69. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
70. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
71. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
72. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
73. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
74. What are your hardware and software requirements?
<--- Score
75. Is the Master Data Services scope manageable?
<--- Score
76. Is there a clear Master Data Services case definition?
<--- Score
77. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Master Data Services goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
78. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
79. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Master Data Services? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
80. Are there any specific Identity Management requirements?
<--- Score
81. Do you have a Master Data Services success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
82. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Master Data Services work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
83. What is the context?
<--- Score
84. What Master Data Services requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Master Data Services leverage and how?
<--- Score
86. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
87. What are the Master Data Services tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
88. Will team members perform Master Data Services work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
89. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
90. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Master Data Services results are met?
<--- Score
91. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
92. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
93. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
94. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
95. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
96. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
97. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
98. Why are you doing Master Data Services and what is the scope?
<--- Score
99. Will team members regularly document their Master Data Services work?
<--- Score
100. How do you manage unclear Master Data Services requirements?
<--- Score
101. Are the Master Data Services requirements testable?
<--- Score
102. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
103. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
104. How did the Master Data Services manager receive input to the development of a Master Data Services improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
105. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
106. Is the scope of Master Data Services defined?
<--- Score
107. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
108. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
109. Who approved the Master Data Services scope?
<--- Score
110. Are improvement
