71. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
72. Why is services demand a problem?
<--- Score
73. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
74. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
75. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
76. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
77. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
78. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
79. What does Master Data Services success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
80. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Master Data Services will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
81. Do you need to avoid or amend any Master Data Services activities?
<--- Score
82. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
83. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
84. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
85. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Master Data Services delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
86. What are your needs in relation to Master Data Services skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
87. Why the need?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Master Data Services Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
2. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
3. How will the Master Data Services team and the group measure complete success of Master Data Services?
<--- Score
4. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
5. Is budget approved and allocated for the requirements?
<--- Score
6. When is/was the Master Data Services start date?
<--- Score
7. Is Master Data Services required?
<--- Score
8. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
9. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Master Data Services improvements?
<--- Score
10. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
11. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
12. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
13. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Master Data Services brings?
<--- Score
14. Is Master Data Services linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
15. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
16. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
17. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
18. What is the scope of the Master Data Services work?
<--- Score
19. What are (control) requirements for Master Data Services Information?
<--- Score
20. Is the Master Data Services scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
21. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
22. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
23. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed,
