Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
108. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
109. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
110. Is special Tracking systems user knowledge required?
<--- Score
111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
112. Is the Tracking systems scope manageable?
<--- Score
113. How will the Tracking systems team and the group measure complete success of Tracking systems?
<--- Score
114. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
115. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
116. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Tracking systems? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
117. Why are you doing Tracking systems and what is the scope?
<--- Score
118. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
119. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
120. When is/was the Tracking systems start date?
<--- Score
121. How does the Tracking systems manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
122. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
123. What sources do you use to gather information for a Tracking systems study?
<--- Score
124. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
125. Do you all define Tracking systems in the same way?
<--- Score
126. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
127. Is Tracking systems currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
128. Do you have a Tracking systems success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
129. Are the Tracking systems requirements complete?
<--- Score
130. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Tracking systems brings?
<--- Score
131. How do you think the partners involved in Tracking systems would have defined success?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Tracking systems Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
2. What is the Tracking systems business impact?
<--- Score
3. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
4. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
5. Have you included everything in your Tracking systems cost models?
<--- Score
6. Are Tracking systems vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
7. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
8. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
9. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
10. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
11. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
12. What is the total cost related to deploying Tracking systems, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
13. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
