Do you have a Compensation and Benefits Review success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
9. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
10. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
11. How do you hand over Compensation and Benefits Review context?
<--- Score
12. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Compensation and Benefits Review goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
13. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
14. How do you think the partners involved in Compensation and Benefits Review would have defined success?
<--- Score
15. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
17. Is special Compensation and Benefits Review user knowledge required?
<--- Score
18. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
19. Who approved the Compensation and Benefits Review scope?
<--- Score
20. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
21. Will a Compensation and Benefits Review production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
22. Who are the Compensation and Benefits Review improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
23. What system do you use for gathering Compensation and Benefits Review information?
<--- Score
24. How are consistent Compensation and Benefits Review definitions important?
<--- Score
25. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
26. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
27. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
28. Is the Compensation and Benefits Review scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
29. Are the Compensation and Benefits Review requirements testable?
<--- Score
30. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
31. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
32. How do you manage unclear Compensation and Benefits Review requirements?
<--- Score
33. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
34. How would you define Compensation and Benefits Review leadership?
<--- Score
35. What is the scope?
<--- Score
36. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
37. Is there a clear Compensation and Benefits Review case definition?
<--- Score
38. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Compensation and Benefits Review work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
39. Why are you doing Compensation and Benefits Review and what is the scope?
<--- Score
40. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
41. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
42. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
43. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
44. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
45. Do you all define Compensation and Benefits Review in the same way?
<--- Score
46. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
47. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
48. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
49. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
50. What is the definition of Compensation and Benefits Review excellence?
<--- Score
51. How do you manage changes in Compensation and Benefits Review requirements?
