and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
97. What are the record-keeping requirements of Compensation and Benefits Review activities?
<--- Score
98. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Compensation and Benefits Review brings?
<--- Score
99. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
100. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
101. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
102. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Compensation and Benefits Review?
<--- Score
103. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
104. What Compensation and Benefits Review requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
105. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
106. Is the Compensation and Benefits Review scope manageable?
<--- Score
107. When is/was the Compensation and Benefits Review start date?
<--- Score
108. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
109. Is the scope of Compensation and Benefits Review defined?
<--- Score
110. What was the context?
<--- Score
111. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
112. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
113. Has the Compensation and Benefits Review work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
114. What would be the goal or target for a Compensation and Benefits Review’s improvement team?
<--- Score
115. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
116. Who is gathering Compensation and Benefits Review information?
<--- Score
117. How do you gather Compensation and Benefits Review requirements?
<--- Score
118. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
119. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
120. Has a Compensation and Benefits Review requirement not been met?
<--- Score
121. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
122. What is the scope of the Compensation and Benefits Review effort?
<--- Score
123. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
124. What happens if Compensation and Benefits Review’s scope changes?
<--- Score
125. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
126. What are (control) requirements for Compensation and Benefits Review Information?
<--- Score
127. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
128. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
129. Are accountability and ownership for Compensation and Benefits Review clearly defined?
<--- Score
130. Are the Compensation and Benefits Review requirements complete?
<--- Score
131. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
132. What Compensation and Benefits Review services do you require?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Compensation and Benefits Review Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1.
