the Education and social mobility scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
11. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
12. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
13. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
14. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
15. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
16. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
17. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
18. How would you define Education and social mobility leadership?
<--- Score
19. What is the scope of the Education and social mobility work?
<--- Score
20. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
21. Is Education and social mobility currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
22. Are accountability and ownership for Education and social mobility clearly defined?
<--- Score
23. Is there a clear Education and social mobility case definition?
<--- Score
24. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
25. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
26. How will the Education and social mobility team and the group measure complete success of Education and social mobility?
<--- Score
27. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
28. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
29. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
30. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
31. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
32. What are the core elements of the Education and social mobility business case?
<--- Score
33. Has the Education and social mobility work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
34. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
35. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
36. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
37. What is in scope?
<--- Score
38. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
39. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
40. What would be the goal or target for a Education and social mobility’s improvement team?
<--- Score
41. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
42. Is there a critical path to deliver Education and social mobility results?
<--- Score
43. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
44. How do you hand over Education and social mobility context?
<--- Score
45. What Education and social mobility requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
46. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
47. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
48. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
49. What is the definition of Education and social mobility excellence?
<--- Score
50. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
51. Is there a Education and social mobility management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
52. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<---
