Score
62. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
63. What was the context?
<--- Score
64. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
65. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Human learning changes?
<--- Score
66. How does the Human learning manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
67. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
68. Is there a clear Human learning case definition?
<--- Score
69. How will the Human learning team and the group measure complete success of Human learning?
<--- Score
70. What would be the goal or target for a Human learning’s improvement team?
<--- Score
71. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
72. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
73. Is the Human learning scope manageable?
<--- Score
74. Is special Human learning user knowledge required?
<--- Score
75. What is the scope of the Human learning effort?
<--- Score
76. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Human learning leverage and how?
<--- Score
77. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Human learning work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
78. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
79. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
81. Is there a critical path to deliver Human learning results?
<--- Score
82. Why are you doing Human learning and what is the scope?
<--- Score
83. Will team members regularly document their Human learning work?
<--- Score
84. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
85. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
86. What is the context?
<--- Score
87. Will a Human learning production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
88. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
89. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Human learning results are met?
<--- Score
90. How do you manage changes in Human learning requirements?
<--- Score
91. Is the Human learning scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
92. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
93. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
94. How do you gather Human learning requirements?
<--- Score
95. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
96. What is the scope of Human learning?
<--- Score
97. What are the Human learning use cases?
<--- Score
98. Is Human learning required?
<--- Score
99. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
100. Do you all define Human learning in the same way?
<--- Score
101. Is there a Human learning management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
102. Are the Human learning requirements testable?
<--- Score
103. How have you defined all Human learning requirements first?
<--- Score
104. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Human learning brings?
<--- Score
105. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
106.
