<--- Score
102. Is the Information logistics scope manageable?
<--- Score
103. Will team members regularly document their Information logistics work?
<--- Score
104. What is the scope of Information logistics?
<--- Score
105. What is in scope?
<--- Score
106. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information logistics leverage and how?
<--- Score
107. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
108. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
109. Is Information logistics linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
110. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Information logistics results are met?
<--- Score
111. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
112. Do you all define Information logistics in the same way?
<--- Score
113. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information logistics work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
114. How do you hand over Information logistics context?
<--- Score
115. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information logistics? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
116. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
117. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information logistics activities?
<--- Score
118. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
119. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
120. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
121. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
122. How will the Information logistics team and the group measure complete success of Information logistics?
<--- Score
123. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
124. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
125. When is/was the Information logistics start date?
<--- Score
126. Has the Information logistics work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
127. What are the Information logistics tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
128. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
129. What is the scope of the Information logistics work?
<--- Score
130. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
131. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
132. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
133. Has a Information logistics requirement not been met?
<--- Score
134. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
135. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
136. How are consistent Information logistics definitions important?
<--- Score
137. How do you think the partners involved in Information logistics would have defined success?
<--- Score
138. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
139. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
140. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
141. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Information logistics Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT:
