Score
99. When is/was the Administrative review start date?
<--- Score
100. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
101. How do you gather Administrative review requirements?
<--- Score
102. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
103. Will team members regularly document their Administrative review work?
<--- Score
104. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
105. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
106. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
107. What gets examined?
<--- Score
108. What are the Administrative review use cases?
<--- Score
109. Has a Administrative review requirement not been met?
<--- Score
110. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
111. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
112. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
113. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
114. Will a Administrative review production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
115. What is the scope of the Administrative review work?
<--- Score
116. Is Administrative review linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
117. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
118. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
119. Have all basic functions of Administrative review been defined?
<--- Score
120. What is the scope of Administrative review?
<--- Score
121. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
122. Is the scope of Administrative review defined?
<--- Score
123. What happens if Administrative review’s scope changes?
<--- Score
124. How did the Administrative review manager receive input to the development of a Administrative review improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
125. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
126. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
127. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
128. Are accountability and ownership for Administrative review clearly defined?
<--- Score
129. How do you manage changes in Administrative review requirements?
<--- Score
130. How would you define Administrative review leadership?
<--- Score
131. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
132. Is there a Administrative review management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
133. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
134. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
135. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
136. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
137. How do you hand over Administrative review context?
<--- Score
138. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Administrative review results are met?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Administrative review Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT:
