review required?
<--- Score
11. What was the context?
<--- Score
12. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
13. What is in scope?
<--- Score
14. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
15. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
16. How are consistent Administrative review definitions important?
<--- Score
17. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
18. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
19. What are (control) requirements for Administrative review Information?
<--- Score
20. Is special Administrative review user knowledge required?
<--- Score
21. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
22. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
23. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
24. How can the value of Administrative review be defined?
<--- Score
25. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
26. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Administrative review? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
27. Who is gathering Administrative review information?
<--- Score
28. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
29. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
30. Will team members perform Administrative review work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
31. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
32. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
33. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
34. What is the context?
<--- Score
35. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
36. What would be the goal or target for a Administrative review’s improvement team?
<--- Score
37. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
38. What sources do you use to gather information for a Administrative review study?
<--- Score
39. How have you defined all Administrative review requirements first?
<--- Score
40. Who approved the Administrative review scope?
<--- Score
41. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
42. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
43. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
44. Why are you doing Administrative review and what is the scope?
<--- Score
45. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Administrative review goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
46. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
47. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
48. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Administrative review changes?
<--- Score
49. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
50. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Administrative review brings?
<--- Score
51. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Administrative review?
<--- Score
52. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
53. Is Administrative review currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
54. How will the Administrative review team and the group measure complete success
