review?
<--- Score
55. Is the Administrative review scope manageable?
<--- Score
56. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
57. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
58. How does the Administrative review manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
59. Are the Administrative review requirements testable?
<--- Score
60. What are the State administrative review requirements for school food authorities and organizations?
<--- Score
61. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
62. What Administrative review services do you require?
<--- Score
63. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
64. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
65. What Administrative review requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
66. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
67. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
68. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
69. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
70. What system do you use for gathering Administrative review information?
<--- Score
71. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
72. What is the role and requirements of administrative review (hearing) officials?
<--- Score
73. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
74. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Administrative review work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
75. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
76. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
77. Who are the Administrative review improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
78. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
79. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
80. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
81. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
82. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
83. Is there a clear Administrative review case definition?
<--- Score
84. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Administrative review leverage and how?
<--- Score
86. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
87. Has the Administrative review work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
88. Do you all define Administrative review in the same way?
<--- Score
89. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
90. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
91. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
92. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
93. Are the Administrative review requirements complete?
<--- Score
94. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
95. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
96. Is there any additional Administrative review definition of success?
<--- Score
97. How do you think the partners involved in Administrative review would have defined success?
<--- Score
98. What information should you gather?
