levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
14. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
15. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Quality in Health Care leverage and how?
<--- Score
16. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
17. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
18. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
19. When is/was the Quality in Health Care start date?
<--- Score
20. How do you manage unclear Quality in Health Care requirements?
<--- Score
21. What are (control) requirements for Quality in Health Care Information?
<--- Score
22. Is Quality in Health Care currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
23. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
24. What happens if Quality in Health Care’s scope changes?
<--- Score
25. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Quality in Health Care? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
26. Do you have a Quality in Health Care success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
27. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Quality in Health Care goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
28. What system do you use for gathering Quality in Health Care information?
<--- Score
29. Why are you doing Quality in Health Care and what is the scope?
<--- Score
30. Is there a clear Quality in Health Care case definition?
<--- Score
31. What are the Quality in Health Care tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
32. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
33. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
34. What is the scope of the Quality in Health Care work?
<--- Score
35. What sources do you use to gather information for a Quality in Health Care study?
<--- Score
36. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
37. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
38. How do you catch Quality in Health Care definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
39. How have you defined all Quality in Health Care requirements first?
<--- Score
40. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
41. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
42. Is special Quality in Health Care user knowledge required?
<--- Score
43. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
44. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
45. What Quality in Health Care services do you require?
<--- Score
46. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
47. How do you manage changes in Quality in Health Care requirements?
<--- Score
48. Will team members perform Quality in Health Care work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
49. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
50. Has the Quality in Health Care work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
51. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Quality in Health Care changes?
<--- Score
52. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
53. What is in scope?
<--- Score
54. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
55. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
56.
