Source Selection Criteria: Microsoft Exchange Server215
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Microsoft Exchange Server217
2.39 Change Management Plan: Microsoft Exchange Server219
3.0 Executing Process Group: Microsoft Exchange Server221
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Microsoft Exchange Server223
3.2 Change Request: Microsoft Exchange Server225
3.3 Change Log: Microsoft Exchange Server227
3.4 Decision Log: Microsoft Exchange Server229
3.5 Quality Audit: Microsoft Exchange Server231
3.6 Team Directory: Microsoft Exchange Server233
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Microsoft Exchange Server235
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Microsoft Exchange Server237
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Microsoft Exchange Server239
3.10 Issue Log: Microsoft Exchange Server241
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Microsoft Exchange Server243
4.1 Project Performance Report: Microsoft Exchange Server245
4.2 Variance Analysis: Microsoft Exchange Server247
4.3 Earned Value Status: Microsoft Exchange Server249
4.4 Risk Audit: Microsoft Exchange Server251
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Microsoft Exchange Server253
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Microsoft Exchange Server255
5.0 Closing Process Group: Microsoft Exchange Server257
5.1 Procurement Audit: Microsoft Exchange Server259
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Microsoft Exchange Server261
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Microsoft Exchange Server263
5.4 Lessons Learned: Microsoft Exchange Server265
Index267
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What does another user on your network need in order to view your calendar?
<--- Score
2. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
3. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
4. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
5. How are the Microsoft Exchange Server’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
6. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
7. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
8. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
9. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
10. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
11. Does Microsoft Exchange Server create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
12. Do you currently use Microsoft Exchange Server for your messaging needs?
<--- Score
13. Do you want someone else to ensure email uptime and security issues?
<--- Score
14. Do you know what you need to know about Microsoft Exchange Server?
<--- Score
15. Do you need to avoid or amend any Microsoft Exchange Server activities?
<--- Score
16. Who should resolve the Microsoft Exchange Server issues?
<--- Score
17. What is the extent or complexity of the Microsoft Exchange Server problem?
<--- Score
18. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Microsoft Exchange Server as an effective investment?
<--- Score
19. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
20. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
21. Consider your own Microsoft Exchange Server project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
22. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
23. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
24. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
25. What Microsoft Exchange Server problem should be solved?
<--- Score
26. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will
