What happens if Microsoft Exchange Server’s scope changes?
<--- Score
56. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Microsoft Exchange Server? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
57. Is there a Microsoft Exchange Server management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
58. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
59. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
60. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
61. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
62. What was the context?
<--- Score
63. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
64. What sources do you use to gather information for a Microsoft Exchange Server study?
<--- Score
65. Do you all define Microsoft Exchange Server in the same way?
<--- Score
66. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
67. What are the core elements of the Microsoft Exchange Server business case?
<--- Score
68. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
69. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Microsoft Exchange Server results are met?
<--- Score
70. Is there a clear Microsoft Exchange Server case definition?
<--- Score
71. Why are you doing Microsoft Exchange Server and what is the scope?
<--- Score
72. What are (control) requirements for Microsoft Exchange Server Information?
<--- Score
73. How do you hand over Microsoft Exchange Server context?
<--- Score
74. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
75. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
76. What are the Microsoft Exchange Server use cases?
<--- Score
77. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
78. What is the scope of Microsoft Exchange Server?
<--- Score
79. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
80. How do you manage changes in Microsoft Exchange Server requirements?
<--- Score
81. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
82. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
83. How do you catch Microsoft Exchange Server definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
84. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
85. Is Microsoft Exchange Server currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
86. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
87. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Microsoft Exchange Server brings?
<--- Score
88. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
89. Is there any additional Microsoft Exchange Server definition of success?
<--- Score
90. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
91. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
92. What would be the goal or target for a Microsoft Exchange Server’s improvement team?
<--- Score
93. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
94. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Microsoft Exchange Server?
<--- Score
95. Will team members perform Microsoft Exchange Server work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
96. Has the Microsoft Exchange Server work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
97. Are customers identified and high impact
