<--- Score
27. Is it needed?
<--- Score
28. What information do users need?
<--- Score
29. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Microsoft Exchange Server leader?
<--- Score
30. What does Microsoft Exchange Server success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
31. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
32. Do you recognize Microsoft Exchange Server achievements?
<--- Score
33. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
34. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
35. How do you recognize an Microsoft Exchange Server objection?
<--- Score
36. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
37. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
38. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Microsoft Exchange Server research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
39. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
40. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Microsoft Exchange Server?
<--- Score
41. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
42. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Microsoft Exchange Server team, Microsoft Exchange Server itself?
<--- Score
43. What vendors make products that address the Microsoft Exchange Server needs?
<--- Score
44. What Microsoft Exchange Server capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
45. What are your needs in relation to Microsoft Exchange Server skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
46. What is the Microsoft Exchange Server problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
47. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Microsoft Exchange Server? In other words, what are the risks, if Microsoft Exchange Server does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
48. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
49. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
50. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
51. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
52. Who needs to know about Microsoft Exchange Server?
<--- Score
53. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
54. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
55. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
56. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
57. What would happen if Microsoft Exchange Server weren’t done?
<--- Score
58. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Microsoft Exchange Server delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
59. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Microsoft Exchange Server?
<--- Score
60. What are the expected benefits of Microsoft Exchange Server to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
61. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
62. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
63. Have you identified your Microsoft Exchange Server key performance indicators?
<--- Score
64. What Microsoft Exchange Server events should you attend?
<--- Score
65. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
66. What are the Microsoft Exchange Server resources needed?
<--- Score
67. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
68. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
69. Does your organization need more Microsoft Exchange Server education?
<--- Score
70.
