Score
52. Why are you doing Open management education and what is the scope?
<--- Score
53. Is the scope of Open management education defined?
<--- Score
54. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
55. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
56. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
57. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
58. How would you define Open management education leadership?
<--- Score
59. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Open management education goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
60. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
61. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
62. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
63. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
64. What is the scope?
<--- Score
65. What is in scope?
<--- Score
66. Is there a clear Open management education case definition?
<--- Score
67. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
68. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
69. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
70. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
71. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
72. Is there a Open management education management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
73. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
74. Are accountability and ownership for Open management education clearly defined?
<--- Score
75. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
76. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
77. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
78. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
79. What are the Open management education use cases?
<--- Score
80. How do you catch Open management education definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
81. Have all basic functions of Open management education been defined?
<--- Score
82. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
83. What is the scope of Open management education?
<--- Score
84. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
85. What sources do you use to gather information for a Open management education study?
<--- Score
86. Will a Open management education production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
87. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
88. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
89. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
90. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
91. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
92. How can the value of Open management education be defined?
<--- Score
93. How do you hand over Open management education context?
<--- Score
94. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Open management education brings?
<--- Score
95. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
96.
