<--- Score
73. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
74. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
75. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
76. Does your organization need more Government transparency education?
<--- Score
77. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Government transparency delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
78. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Government transparency will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
79. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
80. What Government transparency coordination do you need?
<--- Score
81. Think about the people you identified for your Government transparency project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
82. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
83. Does Government transparency create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
84. What vendors make products that address the Government transparency needs?
<--- Score
85. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
86. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Government transparency? In other words, what are the risks, if Government transparency does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
87. What Government transparency events should you attend?
<--- Score
88. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Government transparency?
<--- Score
89. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
90. Have you identified your Government transparency key performance indicators?
<--- Score
91. Did you miss any major Government transparency issues?
<--- Score
92. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Government transparency as an effective investment?
<--- Score
93. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
94. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
95. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
96. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
97. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
98. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Government transparency Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
2. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Government transparency goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
3. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
4. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
5. What Government transparency services do you require?
<--- Score
6. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Government transparency changes?
<--- Score
7. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
8. What is the context?
<--- Score
9. How do you manage changes in Government transparency requirements?
<--- Score
10. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
