Score
60. How do you hand over Health services context?
<--- Score
61. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
62. Are there external requirements that must be achieved?
<--- Score
63. What would be the goal or target for a Health services’s improvement team?
<--- Score
64. Are mental health services a requirement for return to duty?
<--- Score
65. Do you all define Health services in the same way?
<--- Score
66. Has the Health services work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
67. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
68. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
69. Is there a Health services management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
70. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
71. How do you manage unclear Health services requirements?
<--- Score
72. Why are you doing Health services and what is the scope?
<--- Score
73. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
74. How can the value of Health services be defined?
<--- Score
75. Is the Health services scope manageable?
<--- Score
76. Is the Health services scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
77. Are improvement team members fully trained on Health services?
<--- Score
78. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
79. How are consistent Health services definitions important?
<--- Score
80. Is there a critical path to deliver Health services results?
<--- Score
81. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
82. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
83. How do you think the partners involved in Health services would have defined success?
<--- Score
84. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Health services leverage and how?
<--- Score
86. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
87. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Health services?
<--- Score
88. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
89. Who are the Health services improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
90. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
91. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Health services goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
92. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
93. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
94. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
95. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
96. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
97. How did the Health services manager receive input to the development of a Health services improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
98. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
99. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
100. Has a Health services requirement not been met?
<--- Score
101. Is there a clear Health services case definition?
<--- Score
102. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
103.
