and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
18. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Solution brand leverage and how?
<--- Score
19. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
20. How do you catch Solution brand definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
21. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
22. Has the Solution brand work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
23. Who are the Solution brand improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
24. What sources do you use to gather information for a Solution brand study?
<--- Score
25. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
26. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
27. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Solution brand brings?
<--- Score
28. Do you all define Solution brand in the same way?
<--- Score
29. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Solution brand goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
30. What are the Solution brand use cases?
<--- Score
31. How will the Solution brand team and the group measure complete success of Solution brand?
<--- Score
32. What was the context?
<--- Score
33. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
34. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
35. How can the value of Solution brand be defined?
<--- Score
36. Are the Solution brand requirements complete?
<--- Score
37. When is/was the Solution brand start date?
<--- Score
38. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
39. How do you manage changes in Solution brand requirements?
<--- Score
40. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
41. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
42. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
43. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
44. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
45. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
46. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
47. Is there a clear Solution brand case definition?
<--- Score
48. What system do you use for gathering Solution brand information?
<--- Score
49. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
50. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
51. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
52. Are the Solution brand requirements testable?
<--- Score
53. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
54. What Solution brand requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
55. What is the scope of Solution brand?
<--- Score
56. Why are you doing Solution brand and what is the scope?
<--- Score
57. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
58. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
59. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
60. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<---
