How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
74. How does cost-to-serve analysis help?
<--- Score
75. The approach of traditional Information officer works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
76. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
77. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
78. What is the right balance of time and resources between investigation, analysis, and discussion and dissemination?
<--- Score
79. Will Information officer have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
80. How frequently do you verify your Information officer strategy?
<--- Score
81. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
82. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
83. What charts has the team used to display the components of variation in the process?
<--- Score
84. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
85. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
86. Have budget constraints had an impact on IT governance?
<--- Score
87. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
88. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
89. Was a data collection plan established?
<--- Score
90. Which Information officer impacts are significant?
<--- Score
91. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
92. What is the impact of technology change?
<--- Score
93. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
94. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
95. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
96. Do you have any cost Information officer limitation requirements?
<--- Score
97. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
98. What particular quality tools did the team find helpful in establishing measurements?
<--- Score
99. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
100. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
101. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
102. How can a Information officer test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
103. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
104. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
105. How costly is your existing risk management process?
<--- Score
106. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Information officer results?
<--- Score
107. Is there a Performance Baseline?
<--- Score
108. What have been the most important financial impacts of the EHR?
<--- Score
109. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
110. What are the agreed upon definitions of the high impact areas, defect(s), unit(s), and opportunities that will figure into the process capability metrics?
<--- Score
111. What potential environmental factors impact the Information officer effort?
<--- Score
112. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
113. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
114. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
115. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
116. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
117. What data was collected (past, present, future/ongoing)?
<--- Score
118. Has a cost benefit analysis been performed?
