What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information officer leverage and how?
<--- Score
118. How do you hand over Information officer context?
<--- Score
119. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
120. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
121. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
122. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
123. Will team members perform Information officer work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
124. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
125. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
126. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
127. Who are the Information officer improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
128. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
129. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Information officer Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Who participated in the data collection for measurements?
<--- Score
2. What are the current costs of the Information officer process?
<--- Score
3. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
4. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
5. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
6. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
7. How do you identify and analyze stakeholders and their interests?
<--- Score
8. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
9. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
10. Are the Information officer benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
11. How do you know that any Information officer analysis is complete and comprehensive?
<--- Score
12. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
13. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
14. Is the cost worth the Information officer effort ?
<--- Score
15. Is the scope of Information officer cost analysis cost-effective?
<--- Score
16. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Information officer? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
17. Which stakeholder characteristics are analyzed?
<--- Score
18. How do you train human intelligence analysts to critique or test AI outputs?
<--- Score
19. What key measures identified indicate the performance of the stakeholder process?
<--- Score
20. What impact will a disaster have on your organization?
<--- Score
21. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
22. What are the Information officer investment costs?
<--- Score
23. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Information officer services/products?
<--- Score
24. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
25. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
26. Which costs should be taken into
