you doing Self service software and what is the scope?
<--- Score
14. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Self service software brings?
<--- Score
15. Are accountability and ownership for Self service software clearly defined?
<--- Score
16. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
17. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
18. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
19. Are the Self service software requirements complete?
<--- Score
20. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
21. What is the scope of the Self service software work?
<--- Score
22. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
23. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
24. Has a Self service software requirement not been met?
<--- Score
25. Is there any additional Self service software definition of success?
<--- Score
26. What is in scope?
<--- Score
27. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Self service software results are met?
<--- Score
28. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Self service software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
29. What Self service software services do you require?
<--- Score
30. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
31. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
32. What happens if Self service software’s scope changes?
<--- Score
33. How do you manage changes in Self service software requirements?
<--- Score
34. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
35. Do you have a Self service software success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
36. What are the Self service software use cases?
<--- Score
37. Is the Self service software scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
38. How have you defined all Self service software requirements first?
<--- Score
39. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
40. Who are the Self service software improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
41. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
42. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
43. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
44. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
45. Is there a Self service software management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
46. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
47. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
48. Are the Self service software requirements testable?
<--- Score
49. What is the scope of the Self service software effort?
<--- Score
50. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
51. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
52. Is Self service software currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
53. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
54. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
55. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
56. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<---
