Score
15. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
16. When is/was the Master Planning start date?
<--- Score
17. Is Master Planning currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
18. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
19. What is the scope?
<--- Score
20. Are the Master Planning requirements testable?
<--- Score
21. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
22. Do you have a Master Planning success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
23. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
24. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
25. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
26. What is the definition of Master Planning excellence?
<--- Score
27. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
28. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
29. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
30. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Master Planning changes?
<--- Score
31. Is the Master Planning scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
32. How are consistent Master Planning definitions important?
<--- Score
33. Do you all define Master Planning in the same way?
<--- Score
34. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Master Planning work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
35. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Master Planning?
<--- Score
36. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
37. Are accountability and ownership for Master Planning clearly defined?
<--- Score
38. What Master Planning requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
39. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
40. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
41. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
42. Has a Master Planning requirement not been met?
<--- Score
43. Has the Master Planning work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
44. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
45. Who is gathering Master Planning information?
<--- Score
46. What is the scope of the Master Planning work?
<--- Score
47. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
48. Is Master Planning linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
49. What system do you use for gathering Master Planning information?
<--- Score
50. Who are the Master Planning improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
51. What is in scope?
<--- Score
52. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
53. How does the Master Planning manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
54. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
55. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
56. What gets examined?
<--- Score
57. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
58.
