Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
105. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
106. What are (control) requirements for Master Planning Information?
<--- Score
107. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
108. Is special Master Planning user knowledge required?
<--- Score
109. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
110. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Master Planning? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
111. Is the Master Planning scope manageable?
<--- Score
112. What are the record-keeping requirements of Master Planning activities?
<--- Score
113. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
114. How do you hand over Master Planning context?
<--- Score
115. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
116. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
117. Is there a critical path to deliver Master Planning results?
<--- Score
118. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
119. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
120. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
121. Have all basic functions of Master Planning been defined?
<--- Score
122. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Master Planning goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
123. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
124. How would you define Master Planning leadership?
<--- Score
125. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
126. How do you gather Master Planning requirements?
<--- Score
127. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
128. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
129. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
130. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
131. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Master Planning Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
2. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
3. Does a Master Planning quantification method exist?
<--- Score
4. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
5. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
6. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
7. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
8. How sensitive must the Master Planning strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
9. Have you included everything in your Master Planning cost models?
<--- Score
10. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
11. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
12. How will effects be measured?
<---
