Score
103. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
104. How would you define Qualitative methods leadership?
<--- Score
105. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
106. What system do you use for gathering Qualitative methods information?
<--- Score
107. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
108. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
109. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
110. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Qualitative methods work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
111. What gets examined?
<--- Score
112. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Qualitative methods results are met?
<--- Score
113. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
114. Is the scope of Qualitative methods defined?
<--- Score
115. Why are you doing Qualitative methods and what is the scope?
<--- Score
116. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
117. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
118. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
119. Is there a Qualitative methods management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
120. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Qualitative methods leverage and how?
<--- Score
121. What is the definition of Qualitative methods excellence?
<--- Score
122. Is there a critical path to deliver Qualitative methods results?
<--- Score
123. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
124. Will team members regularly document their Qualitative methods work?
<--- Score
125. How do you manage unclear Qualitative methods requirements?
<--- Score
126. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
127. What is the scope of the Qualitative methods effort?
<--- Score
128. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Qualitative methods?
<--- Score
129. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
130. Is there any additional Qualitative methods definition of success?
<--- Score
131. What happens if Qualitative methods’s scope changes?
<--- Score
132. Has the Qualitative methods work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
133. How have you defined all Qualitative methods requirements first?
<--- Score
134. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
135. How do you manage changes in Qualitative methods requirements?
<--- Score
136. Is the Qualitative methods scope manageable?
<--- Score
137. Will team members perform Qualitative methods work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
138. How does the Qualitative methods manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
139. How do you think the partners involved in Qualitative methods would have defined success?
<--- Score
140. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Qualitative methods Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2
