Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics. Patrick Muldowney

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics - Patrick Muldowney страница 19

Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics - Patrick Muldowney

Скачать книгу

limit t is a fixed real number which can be regarded as a degenerate random variable. This result is basic to the construction I1, I2, I3, I4.

      A closer reading of source material may provide answers and/or corrections to some or all of the above comments and queries. Any misinterpretation, confusion, and errors may be dispelled by closer examination of the underlying ideas.

      Aside from these issues, and looking beyond the classical mathematical theory, the general idea of stochastic integral is, in intuitive terms, a persuasive, natural and practical way of thinking about the underlying reality.

      An alternative (and hopefully more understandable) mathematical way of representing this reality is presented in subsequent chapters of this book.

      Example 2

normal upper Omega equals StartSet 1 comma 2 comma ellipsis comma m EndSet comma

      and probability upper P left-parenthesis upper Y Subscript t Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis equals i right-parenthesis equals StartFraction 1 Over m EndFraction. For upper A subset-of-or-equal-to normal upper Omega,

upper P left-parenthesis upper Y Subscript t Baseline element-of upper A right-parenthesis equals StartFraction StartAbsoluteValue upper A EndAbsoluteValue Over m EndFraction comma

      where StartAbsoluteValue upper A EndAbsoluteValue is the number of elements in A. Then, for each t, upper Y Subscript t is a left-parenthesis normal upper Omega comma upper P right-parenthesis‐measurable function and thus a random variable. (We may also suppose, if it is convenient for us, that for any t, t prime, the random variables upper Y Subscript t Baseline comma upper Y Subscript t prime Baseline are independent.)

      Now suppose that, for 0 less-than t less-than-or-equal-to tau, upper Z Subscript t is another indeterminate or unpredictable quantity; and that, for given t, the possible values of upper Z Subscript t depend in some deterministic way on the corresponding values of upper Y Subscript t, so

upper Z Subscript t Baseline equals f left-parenthesis upper Y Subscript t Baseline right-parenthesis

      where f is a deterministic function. For instance, the deterministic relation could be upper Z Subscript t Baseline equals upper Y Subscript t Superscript 2, so if the value taken by upper Y Subscript t at time t is y Subscript t, then the value that upper Z Subscript t takes is y Subscript t Superscript 2. Provided f is a “reasonably nice” function (such as left-parenthesis dot right-parenthesis squared), then upper Z Subscript t is measurable with respect to left-parenthesis normal upper Omega comma upper P right-parenthesis, and is itself a random variable.

      This scenario is in broad conformity with I1, I2, I3, I4 above. So it may be possible to consider, in those terms, the stochastic integral of upper Z Subscript t with respect to upper Y Subscript t. Essentially, with normal upper Omega equals StartSet 1 comma ellipsis comma m EndSet, then for each t, for omega equals i element-of normal upper Omega, and for i equals 1 comma ellipsis comma m,

upper Z Subscript t Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis equals f left-parenthesis upper Y Subscript t Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis right-parenthesis comma or upper Z Subscript t Baseline left-parenthesis i right-parenthesis equals f left-parenthesis upper Y Subscript t Baseline left-parenthesis i right-parenthesis right-parenthesis comma

      the two formulations being equivalent. If the stochastic integral “integral Subscript 0 Superscript tau Baseline upper Z Subscript t Baseline d upper Y Subscript t” is to be formulated in terms of Lebesgue integrals in 0 less-than t less-than-or-equal-to tau (as intimated in I1, I2, I3, I4), then some properties of t‐measurability (0 less-than-or-equal-to t less-than-or-equal-to tau) are suggested. This aspect can also be simplified, as follows.

      Just as normal upper Omega was reduced to a finite number m of possible

Скачать книгу